 |
| 1.
|
83%
(-13%) of the visitors came from Mumbai. The show also attracted audience
from other regions. |
 |
| 2.
|
While
47% (-8%) of the visitors came from the Print & Publishing segment,
24 % (+17%) were Print Buyers. |
|
| 3.
|
28%
(+3%) of the visitors were responsible for Purchases. 18% (+5%) came
from the Management side and 19% (-4%) were from Marketing & Sales.
Those from the field of Production ranked at 26% (+3%) |
|
| 4.
|
The
maximum publicity was delivered by Advertisements through Newspaper
i.e. 72% (+14%) |
|
| 5.
|
Maximum
visitor interest was around Commercial Printing at 33% (+4%). 28%
( +2%) visited the exhibition for information on Consumable : Manufacture
& Supply. Those seeking inputs on Digital Print Solutions &
Prepress came next at 19% (+3%). |
|
| 6.
|
22%
(+4%) of the visitors attended PV2K for General Information while
78% (-4%) attended the show for Professional / Business Interest. |
|
| 7.
|
61%
(-6%) of the visitors obtained information they solicited while 30%
(+8%) were not completely satisfied. |
|
| 8.
|
The
visitors ranked PV2K under Excellent, Good and Average as 21% (-2%),
54% (-3%) and 25% (+5%) respectively. |
|
| 9.
|
Most
visitors 61%(-1%) rated the Services/Facilities provided in PRINTVISION
2000 (PV2K) to be Good. |
|
| 10.
|
83%
(-7%) of the visitors found the Show Schedules - Day, Timing and Venue
favourable, with 88% (+2%) recommending that the show be organised
Annually. |
|
| 11.
|
Judging
a stall by its appearance. 59% (-5%) of the visitors ranked the stall
on basis of its Display, followed by Information at 28% (+3%).
|
|
|
| 1.
|
53%
(+31%) leveraged PV2K as a Brand Building tool while 72% (+19%) also
used it to meet with their Long Term Marketing needs. More exhibitors
used the platform for Product Launch 44% (+22%) |
|
| 2. |
The Concept and Designing in most cases were In-House 81% (+8%) while,
only 19% (-8%) opted for Professional services in stall execution. |
|
| 3.
|
A
higher percentage of exhibitors sent special invites to their existing
and prospective clients, while 19% (+8%) did not make any such provisions. |
|
| 4.
|
The
exhibitors disseminated information through a combination of different
mediums : Brochures 77% (+59%), Samples 46% (+36%), Live Demo 21%
(+21%) and Multimedia Presentation 12% (+9%). Most stalls made provisions
for a Visitor Book 67% (-2%) and Gifts 30% |
|
| 5.
|
72%
(-1%) of the exhibitors have participated in other exhibitions. For
about 21% (-6%) PV2K was a maiden experience. |
|
| 6.
|
Exhibitors
ranked the show's Infrastructure and Services under Excellent, Good,
Average and Poor assigning them ranks at 16% (-6%) , 49% (-13%), 25%
(+14%) and 5% (0%) respectively. |
|
| 7.
|
81%
(+25%) of the exhibitors found the Show Schedules - Day, Timing and
Venue favourable. |
|
| 8.
|
93%
of the exhibitors have expressed desire to participate in future PRINTVISION
exhibition, with 54% recommending that the show be organised annually. |
|
| 9.
|
The
feedback from both Visitors' and Exhibitors' is suggestive that PRINTVISION
be organised Annually. |
|
| 10.
|
On
introduction of BMPA PRINTAWARDS, 28% exhibitors found the concept
of PRINTAWARDS to be Excellent while 60% ranked them as Good. |
|
| 11. |
The exhibitors shared few suggestions for making the future shows
most effective:
Appoint Business Center and Cafeteria 7%.
Enforce Entry Restrictions 9%.
While 60% preferred Sunday to be included in the show schedule 23%
|
|
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
){kind=small}
